From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
May 18, 1999
991 S.W.2d 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 74456

OPINION FILED: May 18, 1999

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, SHERRI SULLIVAN, JUDGE.

D. Warren Hoff, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Barbara K. Chesser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before James R. Dowd, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.


ORDER


Movant appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find that the motion court's judgment is based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Following Defendant's previous direct appeal of his underlying criminal convictions, this Court affirmed those convictions. See State v. Gibbs, 948 S.W.2d 260 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997).


Summaries of

Gibbs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
May 18, 1999
991 S.W.2d 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Gibbs v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE GIBBS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: May 18, 1999

Citations

991 S.W.2d 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)