From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. Shasta Cnty. Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 23, 2021
No. 2:21-cv-0027 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2021)

Opinion

No. 2:21-cv-0027 WBS CKD P

02-23-2021

ROBERT ALAN GIBBS, Petitioner, v. SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On January 11, 2021, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the ///// ///// ///// specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: February 23, 2021

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
gibb0027.fpf


Summaries of

Gibbs v. Shasta Cnty. Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 23, 2021
No. 2:21-cv-0027 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Gibbs v. Shasta Cnty. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ALAN GIBBS, Petitioner, v. SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 23, 2021

Citations

No. 2:21-cv-0027 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2021)