From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. Hill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 29, 2008
Civil No. 05-1639-ST (D. Or. Jan. 29, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-1639-ST.

January 29, 2008


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart filed her Findings and Recommendation on January 2, 2008. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-5 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation #39. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (#1) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gibbs v. Hill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 29, 2008
Civil No. 05-1639-ST (D. Or. Jan. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Gibbs v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:JORDAN A. GIBBS, Plaintiff, v. JEAN HILL, Superintendent, Snake River…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 05-1639-ST (D. Or. Jan. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Nitschke v. Belleque

See Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 351 (1989). Petitioner also objects to the Report and Recommendation's…

Lalonde v. Belleque

In effect, Petitioner would have this Court read Rule 5.45(1) in an "as-applied" manner such that any future…