From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. Herrera

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2023
2:21-cv-2188 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2188 TLN AC P

09-27-2023

KENNETH B. GIBBS, Plaintiff, v. A. HERRERA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Due to an administrative error, plaintiff's payment of the filing fee was not docketed at the time of payment and the case was thereafter dismissed on the basis of non-payment. See ECF Nos. 17, 19, 20. Plaintiff appealed the dismissal, and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated the judgment and remanded the case. ECF No. 24.

Accordingly, in the interests of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall RETURN to plaintiff the $505.00 appellate filing fee that he paid on January 27, 2023.

The complaint will be screened pursuant to statute after the Ninth Circuit issues its mandate.


Summaries of

Gibbs v. Herrera

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2023
2:21-cv-2188 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Gibbs v. Herrera

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH B. GIBBS, Plaintiff, v. A. HERRERA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-2188 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2023)