From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibboney v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 23, 2003
No. 05-02-00800-CR (Tex. App. May. 23, 2003)

Opinion

No. 05-02-00800-CR

Opinion Filed May 23, 2003 Do Not Publish

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F01-75746-NT. AFFIRM

Before Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Whittington and Richter


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Douglas Scott Gibboney, II appeals his conviction for intoxication assault. Appellant entered an open guilty plea to the charge. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Gibboney v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 23, 2003
No. 05-02-00800-CR (Tex. App. May. 23, 2003)
Case details for

Gibboney v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS SCOTT GIBBONEY, II, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: May 23, 2003

Citations

No. 05-02-00800-CR (Tex. App. May. 23, 2003)