From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giarrusso v. New Orleans Book Mart

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Dec 10, 1974
304 So. 2d 734 (La. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

Nos. 6466-6469.

December 10, 1974.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, DIVISION "I", PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE MELVIN J. DURAN, J.

Michael Silvers, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

Blake G. Arata, City Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before STOULIG, MORIAL and BOURG, JJ.


Plaintiff instituted these suits against defendant and its four (4) lessors for an injunction under the Abatement of Public Nuisance Act. LSA-R.S. 13:4711-4717. Subsequently, each lessor posted bond pursuant to the provisions of LSA-R.S. 13:4715 and the proceedings were discontinued insofar as they affected each of the four (4) properties leased to New Orleans Book Mart, Inc., and described in plaintiff's petition.

In each case, the district court judgment declared defendant guilty of maintaining a public nuisance of obscenity in the City of New Orleans, directed the closing of its business at each location, and granted an injunction prohibiting it from maintaining or carrying on or permitting the practice of obscenity upon the premises of each location.

Defendant filed a brief but did not appear for oral argument, while the plaintiff did neither.

The Supreme Court of Louisiana in Gulf States Theatres of Louisiana, Inc., et al. v. Richardson, 287 So.2d 480 (La. 1973) in declaring LSA-R.S. 13:4711-4717 unconstitutional stated:

"* * * The plaintiffs, defendants in reconvention, also attack these statutes and the injunction issued against them on the ground that R.S. 14:106A(2) is unconstitutional. The argument is that obscenity referred to in the nuisance statutes is, by those statutes, defined by the "Criminal Laws of this State", (R.S. 14:106) and, therefore, if R.S. 14:106A (2) is unconstitutional, the nuisance statutes are unconstitutional and the injunction issued against them is illegal, void and of no effect. We have considered the constitutionality of R.S. 14:106A(2) and (3) in State v. Shreveport News Agency, Inc., 287 So.2d 464 (La. 1973), and State v. McNutt, 287 So.2d 478 (La. 1973).

"For the reasons assigned in State v. Shreveport News Agency, Inc., and State v. McNutt, plaintiffs' allegation of unconstitutionality here is supported and, pursuant to the clear pronouncement by the United States Supreme Court, we have declared R.S. 14:106(2) and (3) to be unconstitutional. For that reason and other reasons herein presented, we hereby declare R.S. 13:4711-1717 unconstitutional, insofar as they attempt to declare obscenity a public nuisance. * * *"

We are bound by the explicit holding of the Supreme Court of Louisiana. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the injunction is dissolved, vacated and set aside.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Giarrusso v. New Orleans Book Mart

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Dec 10, 1974
304 So. 2d 734 (La. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Giarrusso v. New Orleans Book Mart

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE B. GIARRUSSO v. NEW ORLEANS BOOK MART, INC., ET AL

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 1974

Citations

304 So. 2d 734 (La. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

State v. A Motion Picture Entitled "The Bet”

(287 So.2d pp. 491, 492.)Gulf States Theatres was followed in Giarrusso v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc., 304…

Chittenden v. State Farm

With respect to the weight to be given to the decision inEvans v. Cal Dive International, Inc., supra, by…