From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giardino Corporation v. Goldblatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1952
279 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

March 3, 1952.


Order granting plaintiffs' motion for a compulsory reference under section 466 of the Civil Practice Act, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. Although the granting of the motion did not impinge upon the constitutional right to a trial by jury ( Steck v. Colorado Fuel Iron Co., 142 N.Y. 236; 4 Carmody on New York Practice, p. 2692, and cases cited) the record did not warrant the granting of a compulsory order of reference on the ground that the examination of a long account was necessary within the meaning of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act, under long-settled authority. ( Davidson v. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875, and cases cited therein; Untermyer v. Beinhauer, 105 N.Y. 521.) Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Giardino Corporation v. Goldblatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1952
279 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Giardino Corporation v. Goldblatt

Case Details

Full title:GIARDINO CORPORATION et al., Respondents, v. J. HARRY GOLDBLATT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)