From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gianzero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-00656-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-00656-REB-BNB

08-04-2011

JOSEPHINE GIANZERO and JENNIFER JENSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation; CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC., an Arkansas corporation; AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., a New York corporation; CONCENTRA HEALTH SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-10, whose true names are unknown Defendants.

Frances A. Koncilja W. Bradley Betterton-Fike [up]Koncilja & Associates, P.C.[/up] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Solomon B. Cera [up]gold bennett cera & sidener, llp[/up] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Steven U. Mullens STEVEN U. MULLENS, P.C. 105 E. Moreno Avenue Attorneys for Plaintiffs Naomi G. Beer Brian L. Duffy Naomi G. Beer Jeannette M. Brook GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Attorneys for Defendants, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Claims Management, Inc. and American Home Assurance Co. Amy Cook-O l son C. Todd Drak e [up]Montgomery L i ttle Soran & Murray, P.C.[/up] Attorneys for Defendant Concentra Health Services


SECOND AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Each Party and each Counsel of Record stipulate and move the Court for a Protective Order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning the treatment of Confidential Information (as hereinafter defined), and, as grounds, states as follows: Good cause having been shown,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. In this action, at least one of the Parties has sought and/or is seeking Confidential Information (as defined in Paragraph 2 below). The Parties also anticipate seeking additional Confidential Information during discovery and that there will be questioning concerning Confidential Information in the course of depositions. The Parties assert the disclosure of such information outside the scope of this litigation could result in significant injury to one or more of the Parties' business or privacy interests. The Parties have entered into this Stipulation and request the Court to enter the within Protective Order for the purpose of preventing the disclosure and use of Confidential Information except as set forth herein and prohibiting the Parties from using or disclosing the Confidential Information for any purpose other than this litigation.

I. Definitions

2. "Confidential Information" means any document, file, portions of files, transcribed testimony, or response to a discovery request, including any extract, abstract, chart, summary, note, or copy made therefrom - not made available to the public - and designated by one of the Parties in the manner provided in Paragraph 5 below. "Confidential information" includes, but is not limited to, non-public documents and/or data in which the Producing Party (defined below) claims a common law privacy interest, statutory privacy interest, regulatory privacy interest, protected health information subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), and/or trade secrets.

3. "Producing Party" means the party that produces Confidential Information.

4. "Receiving Party" means the party receiving Confidential Information.

II. Designation of Material

5. Where Confidential Information is produced, provided or otherwise disclosed by a Party in response to any discovery request, it will be designated in the following manner:

a. By imprinting the word "Confidential" on each page of the document produced;
b. With respect to electronically stored information that is not bates-numbered, by imprinting the word "Confidential" on the compact disc (or other media) containing the material produced;
c. By imprinting the word "Confidential" next to or above any response to a discovery request; or
d. With respect to transcribed testimony, by giving written notice to opposing counsel designating portions thereof as "Confidential" no later than ten calendar days after receipt of the transcribed testimony or by designating on the record at the deposition such portions as "Confidential."

6. If the Producing Party objects to the Receiving Party's challenge of a designation of Confidential Information, within 10 days of receipt of notification of the Receiving Party's challenge, the Producing Party shall file an appropriate motion with the Court to determine the proper designation of the material. The Producing Party shall have the burden of proof in establishing the propriety of the designation. If the Producing Party does not file a motion to determine the proper designation within 10 days of receipt of notification of the Receiving Party's challenge, the Producing Party's designation shall be deemed null and void. If timely submitted, the material shall continue to have Confidential Information status from the time it is produced until the ruling by the Court.

III. Restrictions on the Use of Designated Material

7. All Confidential Information provided by a Party in response to a discovery request or in transcribed testimony shall be subject to the following restrictions:

a. It shall not be disclosed, revealed, leaked to the media, or be used for any other purpose or business whatsoever except the preparation and trial of this case.;
b. It shall not be communicated or disclosed by any Party's counsel or a Party in any manner, either directly or indirectly, to anyone except those employed by the law firms representing the parties, designated testifying experts, treating physicians and health care providers, rebuttal experts, consultants, and necessary third party vendors for purposes of this case (e.g., copying services, electronic discovery services, stenographers, etc.); and
c. It shall not be communicated or disclosed by the Parties, their Counsel and/or the persons employed by the law firms representing the Parties, unless an affidavit in the form of Exhibit A has been signed by the person receiving such communications or disclosures with exception of counsel for the parties and their support staff,
copying services, stenographers, and treating and health care providers. The exemption for treating and health care providers shall be limited to medical records only.

8. Confidential Information may be used in this litigation among the parties and their counsel, experts, and consultants. Individuals authorized to review Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order shall hold Confidential Information in confidence and shall not divulge such information, either verbally or in writing, to any other person, entity or government agency unless compelled to do so by court order or as otherwise permitted by this Protective Order.

9. Counsel for the Receiving Party shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the terms of this Protective Order with respect to persons to whom such Confidential Information is disclosed and shall obtain and retain the original affidavits signed by qualified recipients of such information.

10. No copies of Confidential Information shall be made except by or on behalf of counsel in this litigation and such copies shall be made and used solely for purposes of this litigation and pursuant to this Protective Order.

11. During the pendency of this litigation, counsel shall retain custody of Confidential Information and copies made therefrom.

IV. Motions to Seal

12. In the event Confidential Information is used in any court filing or proceeding in this action, including but not limited to its use at trial, it shall not lose its confidential status as between the Parties through such use. In the event it is necessary for the Parties to file Confidential Information as well as briefs quoting or discussing confidential information with the Court in connection with any proceeding or motion, the Confidential Information shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.2. and/or 7.3.

V. Inadvertent Disclosure

13. The inadvertent disclosure to another party of any document which is subject to a legitimate claim that the document should have been withheld from disclosure as a privileged attorney/client communication or as attorney work product, shall not constitute a waiver of any privilege or otherwise affect the right to withhold from production as privileged or work product any other documents or information, even though such documents or information may relate to the same or a related transaction or subject matter as the document inadvertently disclosed.

14. Nothing herein shall preclude the non-producing party from requesting the Court to determine whether the document or information is privileged or work product information. In the event that the non-producing party intends to challenge the claim of privilege, the non-producing party may retain a copy of such document for such purposes.

VI. Completion of Litigation

15. The termination of this action shall not relieve counsel or other persons obligated hereunder from their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order, and the Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Protective Order.

16. By agreeing to the entry of this Protective Order, the Parties adopt no position as to the authenticity or admissibility of documents produced subject to it.

17. Subject to any applicable requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the Local Rules, the provisions of this Protective Order shall, absent written permission of the Producing Party or further order of this Court, continue to be binding throughout and after the conclusion of the case, including, without limitation, any appeals therefrom. Unless all of the Parties agree in writing otherwise, 45 days after receiving notice of the entry of an order, judgment, or decree finally disposing of all litigation in which Confidential Information was produced, all Receiving Parties shall assemble and return to any Producing Party or, alternatively, destroy and provide certification of destruction, all Confidential Information received directly or indirectly from the Producing Party, including all copies thereof, all summaries and/or other materials containing or disclosing such Confidential Information, except outside counsel of record may retain in its files a complete set of filings with the Court, deposition transcripts, and any written discovery requests and written responses thereto. The return of such material shall be acknowledged by the Producing Party in writing.

VII. Miscellaneous

18. Nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude any Party from filing a motion seeking further or different protection from the Court under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which Confidential Information shall be treated at trial.

19. If another court or an administrative agency subpoenas or orders production of Confidential Information which a Receiving Party has obtained under the terms of this Protective Order, such party shall promptly notify the Producing Party (of such Confidential Information) before complying with said request.

20. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, any party may freely disclose its own Confidential Information material in any manner it chooses, including to third parties, without impairing the obligations imposed by this Protective Order upon others.

21. The Parties agree that this agreement does not constitute a global waiver by any party as to whether any Confidential Information is discoverable, but rather, is a mechanism by which Confidential Information that is disclosed is prevented from being used for any purpose outside this litigation by any party.

22. The parties acknowledge that medical care may be ongoing as it pertains to the plaintiffs and this order in no way restricts the creation, use, and dissemination of medical records for purposes of care, treatment, billing, and for use in the administration of the underlying workers compensation action(s). The Parties agree that they are not waiving any rights or privileges under HIPAA or the Colorado Workers' Compensation Act.

23. Any documents or information submitted by a third party to a Party pursuant to an informal request or a subpoena shall be subject to the provisions and procedures set forth in this Order. The third party may designate documents or information as "Confidential Information" in accordance with Sections I and II, above. Any document or information designated by a third party as "Confidential Information" will be afforded the protections, and the Parties must abide by the restrictions, contained in Sections III through VII.

24. The Court has considered the specific factors and requirements of a "qualified protective order" as set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(1)(v) with respect to the disclosure and protections afforded protected health information subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") and has determined that hte provision and procedures set forth in this Order do and are intended to comply with the provisions of a "qualified protective order" insofar as this Order:

a. In Section 7, "[p]rohibits the parties from using or disclosing protected health information, for any purpose other than the litigation or proceeding for which such information was requested"; and
b. In Section 17, "[r]equires the return of protected health information to the covered entity [the Producing Party] or
destruction of the protected health information (including all copies made) at the end of the litigation or proceeding."

Because this Order is "an appropriate order of the Court," it also comprises "proper authorization" in accordance with Colorado Revised Statute Sections 18-4-412(1), and 412(2)(c).

DATED August 4, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATED AND AGREED BY:

Frances A. Koncilja

W. Bradley Betterton-Fike

KONCILJA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Solomon B. Cera

GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Steven U. Mullens

STEVEN U. MULLENS, P.C.

105 E. Moreno Avenue

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Naomi G. Beer

Brian L. Duffy

Naomi G. Beer

Jeannette M. Brook

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants, Wal-Mart Stores,

Inc., Claims Management, Inc. and

American Home Assurance Co.

Amy Cook-Olson

C. Todd Drake

MONTGOMERY LITTLE SORAN & MURRAY, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant Concentra Health

Services

EXHIBIT A

AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF ____ )

COUNTY OF ____ )

____, swears or affirms and states under penalty of perjury:

1. I have read and understand the Protective Order in Civil Action No. ____ , a copy of which is attached to this Affidavit.

2. I promise that I will not divulge, or undertake to divulge to any person or recording device, any Confidential Information shown or told to me except as authorized in the Protective Order.

3. I understand that the violation of the terms of the Protective Order will constitute a breach of the Protective Order and may subject me to sanctions, including contempt of Court and/or injunction, as well as a possible claim for damages.

4. For the purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order, I hereby submit myself to the jurisdiction of the Court in the civil action referenced above.

5. I will abide by and agree to be bound by the terms of the Protective Order.

____

(Signature)

____

(Print or Type Name)

Address: ________

Telephone No.: (____) ____

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __ day of ____ 200 ____ by ____

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

____

Notary Public

[SEAL]

My Commission Expires:


Summaries of

Gianzero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-00656-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Gianzero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE GIANZERO and JENNIFER JENSEN, individually and on behalf of all…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-00656-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 4, 2011)