From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giant Tiger Corp. v. Bd. of Commrs. of City of Trenton

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 4, 1934
172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Submitted February 16, 1934 —

Decided May 4, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 797.

For the appellants, Alexander Budson and Henry Hartman.

For the respondents, Charles E. Bird and Romulus P. Rimo.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 10.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PERSKIE, DEAR, JJ. 3.


Summaries of

Giant Tiger Corp. v. Bd. of Commrs. of City of Trenton

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 4, 1934
172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Giant Tiger Corp. v. Bd. of Commrs. of City of Trenton

Case Details

Full title:GIANT TIGER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 4, 1934

Citations

172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)
113 N.J.L. 34