From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gianakos v. White

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01056-NONE-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01056-NONE-SKO-HC

07-16-2021

MICHAEL SEAN GIANAKOS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN WHITE, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND RESPONDENT [DOC. NO. 6]

ORDER SUBSTITUTING WARDEN WHITE AS RESPONDENT IN THIS MATTER

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 6, 2021, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. He named the United States of America as Respondent in this matter.

On July 15, 2021, Petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to name Warden White as Respondent in this matter. Warden White is the proper respondent as he is the warden at the petitioner's institution and has “day-to-day control over” the petitioner. Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, Petitioner's motion to amend the respondent is GRANTED. Warden White is hereby SUBSTITUTED as Respondent in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gianakos v. White

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01056-NONE-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Gianakos v. White

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SEAN GIANAKOS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN WHITE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01056-NONE-SKO-HC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)