From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gianakon v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 6, 1966
358 F.2d 731 (3d Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 15637.

Argued March 11, 1966.

Decided April 6, 1966.

Harry G. Gianakon, pro se.

Jonathan S. Cohen, Tax Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before SMITH and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, District Judge.


This matter is before this Court on a petition to review a decision of the Tax Court in which it was held that certain expenditures for educational purposes were not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under § 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 162(a) and § 1.162-5(b) of the Treasury Regulations, 26 C.F.R. § 1.162-5. The only question for our decision is whether there exists in the record an adequate evidentiary basis for the decision. Cleveland v. C.I.R., 335 F.2d 473 (3rd Cir. 1964) and the cases therein cited. Upon an examination of the record we are convinced that the Tax Court's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and its conclusion is in accord with the law.

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Gianakon v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 6, 1966
358 F.2d 731 (3d Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Gianakon v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:Harry G. GIANAKON and Helen L. Gianakon, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 6, 1966

Citations

358 F.2d 731 (3d Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Voigt v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

He emphasizes that Marilyn did not undertake a program of study and training at an accredited psychoanalytic…