Opinion
Case No.: 2:18-cv-1804-GMN-BNW
11-19-2019
SINBAD S. GHOLSON, Plaintiff, v. COVER WALLET, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, (ECF No. 9), which recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with leave to amend.
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See Min. Order, ECF No. 9) (setting a November 6, 2019 deadline for objections) ///
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 9), is ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have twenty-one days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint.
The Clerk is instructed to close the case.
DATED this 19 day of November, 2019.
/s/_________
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
United States District Court