From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ghannam v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2013
2013-3050 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

2013-3050

03-07-2013

WENDY W. GHANNAM, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review from the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC0841120179-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Office of Personnel Management moves to recaption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Wendy Ghannam's petition for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The respondent should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

_________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s25


Summaries of

Ghannam v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2013
2013-3050 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Ghannam v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:WENDY W. GHANNAM, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

2013-3050 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2013)