From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gettman v. Ford Motor Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. CV 11 3133 SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11 3133 SC Case No. CV 11 3832 SC

10-07-2011

JO ANN GETTMAN, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. VINCENT PERRONE, CHARLES JOHNSON, JAMES DENNING, ZANE DERY, RICHARD DOUGLAS, MELIA DOUGLAS, THOMAS BELL, AND MICHAEL ANTRAMZARZA, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, , Defendants.

AMIR M. NASSIHI (SBN: 235936) SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY KEITH G. BREMER (SBN: 155920) ALISON K. HURLEY (SBN: 234042) BREMER WHYTE BROWN & O'MEARA LLP ADAM J. LEVITT WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLC THOMAS C. JONES DAVIS BETHUNE & JONES LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs Vincent Perrone, Charles Johnson, James Denning, Zane Dery, Richard Douglas, Melia Douglas, Thomas Bell, and Michael Antramzarza


AMIR M. NASSIHI (SBN: 235936)

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.

Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY

KEITH G. BREMER (SBN: 155920)

ALISON K. HURLEY (SBN: 234042)

BREMER WHYTE BROWN & O'MEARA LLP

ADAM J. LEVITT

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLC

THOMAS C. JONES

DAVIS BETHUNE & JONES LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Vincent Perrone, Charles Johnson, James Denning, Zane Dery,

Richard Douglas, Melia Douglas, Thomas Bell, and Michael Antramzarza

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO

PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND

WHEREAS the Parties had previously stipulated to extend the time to respond to the complaint in Gettman v. Ford Motor Co., CV 11 3133 SC, and Perrone v. Ford Motor Co., CV 11 3832 SC, to October 10, 2011.

WHEREAS the Parties submitted declarations on September 30 and October 3, 2011, identifying no other active related cases beyond those currently related before this Court.

WHEREAS on October 3, 2011, the Gettman/Perrone Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Renew their previous Motion to Consolidate and Appoint Interim Class Counsel.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, pursuant to L.R. 6-1(a), that defendant Ford Motor Company's time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in the above-captioned Gettman and Perrone matters shall be extended 14 days to October 24, 2011.

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON, L.L.P.

AMIR NASSIHI

Attorneys for Defendant

FORD MOTOR COMPANY

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLC

ADAM J. LEVITT

and

KEITH G. BREMER

ALISON K. HURLEY

BREMER WHYTE BROWN &

O'MEARA LLP

THOMAS C. JONES

DAVIS BETHUNE & JONES LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Vincent Perrone,

Charles Johnson, James Denning, Zane

Dery, Richard Douglas, Melia Douglas,

Thomas Bell, and Michael Antramzarza

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Samul Conti

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I, Amir Nassihi, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD OF ORTHERWISE RESPOND. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Plaintiff's counsel has concurred in this filing.

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON, L.L.P.

AMIR NASSIHI

Attorneys for Defendant

FORD MOTOR COMPANY


Summaries of

Gettman v. Ford Motor Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. CV 11 3133 SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Gettman v. Ford Motor Co.

Case Details

Full title:JO ANN GETTMAN, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11 3133 SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)