From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gersten v. Lemke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 2009
68 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

December 29, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered November 24, 2008, which denied defendant-appellant's motion to change venue to Nassau County on the ground of witness convenience, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Andrias. J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.


Defendant's bare assertions of inconvenience fail to show the manner in which his proposed witnesses would be inconvenienced by having to travel between Nassau and New York Counties ( see Schoen v Chase Manhattan Automotive Fin. Corp., 274 AD2d 345; cf. Cardona v Aggressive Heating, 180 AD2d 572, 573; Heinemann v Grunfeld, 224 AD2d 204). In addition, the home or work addresses of allegedly inconvenienced witnesses were improperly first provided in defendant's reply papers ( see Schoen, supra; Root v Brotmann, 41 AD3d 247).


Summaries of

Gersten v. Lemke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 2009
68 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Gersten v. Lemke

Case Details

Full title:BEN GERSTEN, Respondent, v. DENNIS M. LEMKE, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 29, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
890 N.Y.S.2d 828

Citing Cases

Pollack v. St. Francis Hosp.

Defendants submitted an affirmation by only one prospective witness, and the witness did not set forth the…

Pollack v. St. Francis Hosp.

Defendants submitted an affirmation by only one prospective witness, and the witness did not set forth the…