From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerst v. Gerst

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Suffolk County
Apr 9, 1987
135 Misc. 2d 112 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1987)

Summary

holding that "Partnership draw is nothing more than a form of compensation whereby partners, pursuant to an agreement, take money from a partnership drawing account on a periodic basis as salary or as a share of profits from the enterprise" in the context of a partner in a law firm

Summary of this case from Wheeler v. Wheeler

Opinion

April 9, 1987

Allen L. Pullin for plaintiff.

Long, Tuminello, Besso, Seligman Quinlan (Diane Smits Lein of counsel), for defendant.


Plaintiff herein moves for an order vacating an income execution served on him pursuant to CPLR 5241. Plaintiff is a partner in a law firm, and was directed by order of this court to pay maintenance to defendant in the sum of $125 per week. After plaintiff's "default" as said term is defined by CPLR 5241 (a) (7), the law firm of which plaintiff is a partner was served with an income execution commending said firm to deduct each week from the income the debtor is receiving or will receive, the total sum of $200, $125 of which shall be on account of current support, and $75 of which shall be applied to the reduction of arrears. Oddly enough, in moving to vacate the income execution, the debtor does not dispute the fact that he is in default, but, rather, claims that plaintiff is a partner and not an employee of said firm, and contends that partnership "draw" is not "income" as said term is defined in CPLR 5241 (a) (6). The court rejects plaintiff's contention and denies his motion to vacate the income execution served on his firm.

CPLR 5241 (a) (6) defines "income" as ANY earned, unearned, taxable or nontaxable income, workers' compensation, disability benefits, unemployment insurance benefits and Federal Social Security benefits as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 662 (f) (2), but excluding public assistance benefits paid pursuant to the Social Services Law and Federal Supplemental Security Income. CPLR 5241 (a) (5) (iii) includes under the definition of "income payor", "any person, corporation, trustee, unincorporated business or association, PARTNERSHIP" (emphasis added) while CPLR 5241 (g) directs an employer or "income payor" served with an execution to commence deductions from income.

Partnership draw is nothing more than a form of compensation whereby partners, pursuant to an agreement, take money from a partnership drawing account on a periodic basis as salary or as a share of profits from the enterprise. Plaintiff offers no proof that his partnership agreement is any different. Accordingly, this motion is denied and the law firm of Gerst Pullin, Esqs. is hereby directed to comply with the income execution served on it.


Summaries of

Gerst v. Gerst

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Suffolk County
Apr 9, 1987
135 Misc. 2d 112 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1987)

holding that "Partnership draw is nothing more than a form of compensation whereby partners, pursuant to an agreement, take money from a partnership drawing account on a periodic basis as salary or as a share of profits from the enterprise" in the context of a partner in a law firm

Summary of this case from Wheeler v. Wheeler
Case details for

Gerst v. Gerst

Case Details

Full title:NEIL GERST, Plaintiff, v. SHERYL GERST, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Trial Term, Suffolk County

Date published: Apr 9, 1987

Citations

135 Misc. 2d 112 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1987)
514 N.Y.S.2d 587

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Wheeler

These well established principles guide us to the conclusion that at the time the agreement was executed in…

Bunger v. Demming

[39] While the trial court might have mischaracterized the basis for its calculation of damages as “net…