From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerolaga v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2007
1:07-cv-00181-OWW-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)

Opinion

1:07-cv-00181-OWW-GSA-PC.

November 5, 2007


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ACTION (Doc. 14) ORDER DISMISSING CASE ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE FILE


Salvador David Gerolaga ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 1, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his case.

"[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(i), `a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.'"Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). "[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can't complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it." Id. at 1078. No defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to close the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gerolaga v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2007
1:07-cv-00181-OWW-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Gerolaga v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:SALVADOR DAVID GEROLAGA, Plaintiff, v. DARREL ADAMS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 5, 2007

Citations

1:07-cv-00181-OWW-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)