From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GERO v. PALLITO

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jul 9, 2010
File No. 2:09 CV 103 (D. Vt. Jul. 9, 2010)

Opinion

File No. 2:09 CV 103.

July 9, 2010


ORDER


The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed June 16, 2010. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

After careful review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the objections, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full.

The respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is GRANTED and Gero's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED.

Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 22(b), a certificate of appealability is DENIED because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of denial of a federal right. Furthermore, the petitioner's grounds for relief do not present issues which are debatable among jurists of reasons, which could have been resolved differently, or which deserve further proceedings. See e.g., Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3rd 878, 882-83 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 513 U.S. 946 (1994); Sawyer v. Collins, 986 F.2d 1493, 1497 (5th cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 933 (1993).

Furthermore, it is certified that any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

THIS CASE IS DISMISSED.


Summaries of

GERO v. PALLITO

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jul 9, 2010
File No. 2:09 CV 103 (D. Vt. Jul. 9, 2010)
Case details for

GERO v. PALLITO

Case Details

Full title:Richard Gero, Petitioner, v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Vermont…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Jul 9, 2010

Citations

File No. 2:09 CV 103 (D. Vt. Jul. 9, 2010)