From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Germanovich v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 29, 2000
270 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 29, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Counsel Fees.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., WISNER, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the application of third-party plaintiffs for judgment against third-party defendant for attorneys' fees, costs and disbursements incurred in the defense of the primary action. Third-party plaintiffs brought their application after the primary action was settled and an unconditional stipulation of settlement signed by the parties was filed. Although a trial court has the power "to exercise supervisory control over all phases of pending actions and proceedings" ( Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51, 54), it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a motion after the action has been "unequivocally terminated * * * [by the execution of] an express, unconditional stipulation of discontinuance" ( Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, supra, at 56; see, Kurtz v. Kurtz, 135 A.D.2d 615; Matter of Town of Johnstown v. City of Gloversville, 36 A.D.2d 143, 145, lv dismissed 29 N.Y.2d 639).


Summaries of

Germanovich v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 29, 2000
270 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Germanovich v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS S. GERMANOVICH, PLAINTIFF, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 29, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
705 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

CITIBANK, N.A. v. REHN

The making and filing of a stipulation of discontinuance has the same effect as an order of discontinuance (…