From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Prods. Liab. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 20, 2015
MDL NO. 2047 SECTION: L (E.D. La. Apr. 20, 2015)

Opinion

MDL NO. 2047 SECTION: L Case No. 2:09-cv-6687 (E.D.La.).

04-20-2015

IN RE: CHINESE-MANUFACTURED DRYWALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Germano, et al. v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., f/k/a Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co. Ltd., et al.



MAG. JUDGE WILKINSON
ORDER & REASONS
(AWARDING DISBURSEMENT OF THE GERMANO INTERVENORS' JUDGMENT)

On May 11, 2010, this Court entered a default judgment against Defendant Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., f/k/a Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co. Ltd. ("Taishan"), and in favor of Plaintiff-intervenors Deborah and William Morgan, Jerry and Inez Baldwin, Joe and Cathy Leach, Robert and Lisa Orlando, Fred and Vanessa Michaux, Preston and Rachel McKellar, and Steven and Elizabeth Heischober (hereinafter, "Intervening Plaintiffs" or "Plaintiffs"). Rec. Doc. No. 3013. Based on the evidence presented at the Germano hearing, the Court awarded damages to the individual Intervening Plaintiffs as follows:

William and Deborah Morgan

$481,613.29, plus $27,550.92 in pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest asappropriate and costs

Jerry and Inez Baldwin

$441,669.11, plus $25,267.61 in pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest asappropriate and costs

Joseph and Cathy Leach

$89,676,86, plus $5,130,01 in pre-judgmentinterest, post-judgment interest as appropriateand costs

Bob and Lisa Orlando

$407,905.44, plus $23,334.43 in pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest asappropriate and costs



J. Frederick and Vanessa Michaux

$355,607.80, plus $20,342.71 in pre-judgment interest, post judgment interest asappropriate and costs

Preston and Rachel McKellar

$351,741.22, plus $20,121.52 in pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest asappropriate and costs

Steven and Elizabeth Heischober

$480,886.27, plus $27,509.33 in pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest asappropriate and costs.


On April 1, 2015, Taishan paid $3,229,196.50 to a special trust account established by Plaintiff's Liaison Counsel for purposes of receiving the judgment the following amounts:

Plaintiff-Intervenor

Damages

Pre-JudgmentInterest

Post-JudgmentInterest

Total Amountby Plantiff

William and Deborah Morgan

$481,613.29

$27,550.92

$9,779.89

$518,944.10

Jerry and Inez Baldwin

$441,669.11

$25,267.61

$8,968.80

$475,905.52

Joseph and Kathy Leach

$89,676.86

$5,130.01

$1,821.03

$96,627.90

Bob and Lisa Orlando

$407,905.44

$23,334.43

$8,283.14

$439,523.01

J. Frederick and Vanessa Michaux

$355,607.80

$20,342.71

$7,221.16

$383,171.67

Preston and Rachel McKellar

$351,741.22

$20,121.52

$7,142.64

$379,005.38

Steven and Elizabeth Heischober

$480,886.27

$27,509.33

$9,765.13

$518,160.73

Other Amounts

Bill of Costs (with Post-Judgment Interest)

$417,858.19

Grand Total

$ 3,229,196.50


The court finds that an award of thirty-percent (30%) of the gross judgment amount for all attorneys' fees (both common benefit and individually retained counsel fees) is appropriate. Thus, the following disbursements are approved, as follows:

Compensating counsel who create a common fund in the manner requested is entirely consistent with well-established jurisprudence. See Union Asset Management Holding, A.G. v. Dell, Inc., 669 F.3d 632, 644 (5th Cir. 2012); Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir. 1974); Evans v. TIN, Inc., 2013 WL 4501061 (E.D. La. Aug. 21, 2013) (Africk, J.); In re Vioxx Prod. Liab. Litig., 574 F. Supp. 2d 606 (E.D. La. 2008); and Hon. Eldon E. Fallon, Common Benefit Fees in Multidistrict Litigation, 74 LA. L. REV. 371 (2014).

Plaintiff

Plaintiff's Award

Attorney's Fee

William and Deborah Morgan

$363,260.87

$155,683.23



Plaintiff

Plaintiff's Award

Attorney's Fee

Jerry and Inez Baldwin

$333,133.86

$142,771.66

Josheph and Kathy Leach

$ 67,639.53

$ 28,988.37

Bob and Lisa Orlando

$307,666.11

$131,856.90

J.Frederick and Vanessa Michaux

$268,220.17

$114,951.50

Preston and Rachel McKellar

$265,303.77

$113,701.61

Steven and Elizabeth Heischober

$362,712.51

$155,448.22

Total

$843,401.49


The court further finds that of the total attorney's fees awarded there should be an equal allocation as follows: 50% for individually retained attorneys ($421,700.75), and 50% for common benefit fees ($421,700.74). Liaison Counsel are hereby Ordered to immediately disburse payments to the Plaintiffs in the appropriate amount set forth above. The Attorney's fees awarded to individually retained counsel, i.e., $421,700.75, are to be disbursed by Liaison Counsel immediately. The 50% allocation of attorneys fees devoted to common benefit counsel are to remain in trust consistent with Pretrial Order No. 28, until further order of the Court.

The court further Orders that the amount assessed against Taishan in this Court's March 23, 2015 order (Rec. Doc. No. 18531) regarding costs (together with post-judgment interest, i.e., $417,858.19), be distributed to the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee for reimbursement of costs.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 20 day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

Eldon E. Fallon

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Prods. Liab. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 20, 2015
MDL NO. 2047 SECTION: L (E.D. La. Apr. 20, 2015)
Case details for

In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Prods. Liab. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: CHINESE-MANUFACTURED DRYWALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION THIS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 20, 2015

Citations

MDL NO. 2047 SECTION: L (E.D. La. Apr. 20, 2015)