From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Germania Life Insurance Company v. Casey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
76 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1906

Decided February 27, 1906

Henry B. Pogson for appellant.

Benjamin N. Cardozo and Jacob Steinhardt for respondent.


Judgment in each action affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the second conclusion of law by the trial court is in part a finding of fact as to an agreement between the plaintiff and the owner of the property for an extension of the time for the payment of the principal sum secured by the mortgage; no opinion.

Concur: GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, VANN and WILLARD BARTLETT, JJ. Dissenting: HAIGHT and CHASE, JJ. Absent: CULLEN, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Germania Life Insurance Company v. Casey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
76 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Germania Life Insurance Company v. Casey

Case Details

Full title:THE GERMANIA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v . JOHN CASEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1906

Citations

76 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1906)
76 N.E. 1095

Citing Cases

Whalen v. Stuart

But counsel for the respondent further contends that even if the so-called conclusion of law as to the…