From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Germain v. Bishop

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 15, 2017
No. 17-6788 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-6788

11-15-2017

JEAN B. GERMAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, JR.; BRUCE A. LILLER, Chief of Psychology; WILLIAM BEAMAN, Director of Nursing; JANETTE CLARK; KRISTA BILAK; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCE, INC., Defendants - Appellees, and JANEATTE SIMMONS, Psychiatry Nurse; C.O. II CODY GILPIN; CO II T. DORCON, Defendants.

Jean Bernard Germain, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Barry Chazen, Gina Marie Smith, Douglas Conrad Meister, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01421-JFM) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jean Bernard Germain, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Barry Chazen, Gina Marie Smith, Douglas Conrad Meister, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jean B. Germain appeals the district court's orders denying his motions for a preliminary injunction and for reconsideration of that denial. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no abuse of discretion. See Di Biase v. SPX Corp., 872 F.3d 224, 229 (4th Cir. 2017) (stating standard of review of order denying preliminary injunction); U.S. ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co., 866 F.3d 199, 206 (4th Cir. 2017) (stating standard of review of order denying reconsideration). We also decline Germain's request to reassign his case. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We are unpersuaded by the Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal, and therefore deny it. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Germain v. Bishop

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 15, 2017
No. 17-6788 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Germain v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:JEAN B. GERMAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, JR.; BRUCE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 15, 2017

Citations

No. 17-6788 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2017)