Opinion
GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP. OF AMERICA; GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP. – U.S. BRANCH; GERLING GLOBAL LIFE REINSURANCE COMPANY; GERLING GLOBAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; GERLING AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY; and CONSTITUTION INSURANCE CORP., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross- Appellants-Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HARRY W. LOW, in his capacity as the COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant-Cross- Appellee-Defendant-Appellee.
ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant-Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HARRY W. LOW, individually, and in his capacity as the INSURANCE COMMISSIONER for the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant-Cross- Appellee-Defendant-Appellee.
W INTERTHUR INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, WINTERTHUR INTERNATIONAL AMERICA UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY; GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, REGENT INSURANCE COMPANY; REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY; SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, UNIGARD INDEMNITY COMPANY; UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY; and BLUE RIDGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants-Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HARRY W. LOW, in his capacity as INSURANCE COMMISSIONER for the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant-Cross- Appellee-Defendant-Appellee.
AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross- Appellants-Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HARRY W. LOW, in his capacity as INSURANCE COMMISSIONER for the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant-Cross- Appellee-Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 01-17023, 01-17433, 02-15282
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
August 12, 2003
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
CV-00-00506-WBS, CV-00-00875-WBS, CV-00-00779-WBS, CV-00-00613-WBS
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Susan P. Graber, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low, 296 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2002), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of American Insurance Ass'n v. Garamendi, 123 S.Ct. 2374 (2003). See Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi, 123 S.Ct. 2638 (2003). We, in turn, remand this matter to the district court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of the Supreme Court's opinion. The mandate shall issue forthwith.