From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerlach v. Andrews

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
C 09-5181 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)

Opinion


ERIC GERLACH, Plaintiff(s), v. MCMILLAN & ANDREWS, Defendant(s) No. C 09-5181 MHP United States District Court, N.D. California. February 10, 2010

          ORDER (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)

          MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.

         The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.


Summaries of

Gerlach v. Andrews

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
C 09-5181 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Gerlach v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:ERIC GERLACH, Plaintiff(s), v. MCMILLAN & ANDREWS, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

C 09-5181 MHP (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)