From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerber v. Day

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Dec 29, 1931
119 Cal.App. 446 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 6925.

December 29, 1931.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. E.J. Marks, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Rosenthal Rosenthal and Nelson Burns for Appellants.

Head, Wellington Jacobs for Respondent.


This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, in an action for alleged malpractice brought against the defendant and respondent, a practicing physician and surgeon. The complaint alleged that the death of one Charles J. Gerber, who was the husband and father of the plaintiffs respectively, was caused by the failure of respondent to administer tetanus antitoxin serum in time to prevent an infection of tetanus. At the close of plaintiff's case, a motion for nonsuit was made, upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to establish the plaintiffs' case.

[1] It is the undisputed evidence that the deceased came to the defendant for treatment, after sustaining an injury, and that when the wound was being dressed, the defendant instructed decedent to procure some tetanus antitoxin serum and bring it back immediately, and for that purpose gave him a note to the druggist; that the deceased demurred to its administration, but took the prescription and failed to have the same filled; that at that time, defendant did not know where the patient lived; that on the next day defendant being called to the house of the decedent, he discovered that the prescription had not been filled; that defendant sent the prescription out to be filled and the serum was administered immediately by the defendant, but the administration was too late, and the patient died from a tetanus infection.

There is nothing in the evidence to show any dereliction of duty on the part of the defendant physician and surgeon. No dereliction of duty being shown on the part of the physician, the motion for nonsuit was properly granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Conrey, P.J., and Houser, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Gerber v. Day

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Dec 29, 1931
119 Cal.App. 446 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

Gerber v. Day

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE F. GERBER et al., Appellants, v. Dr. EMORY C. DAY, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Dec 29, 1931

Citations

119 Cal.App. 446 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
6 P.2d 535

Citing Cases

Gorlin v. Master Contr. Corp.

Thus, in view of the overriding emergency presented of possible tetanus infection from a punctured wound, the…