From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerard v. T.A. Clarke Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

November, 1928.


Judgment and order reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. There is a defect in the proof with respect to the financial ability of the proposed purchasers. ( Alt v. Doscher, 102 App. Div. 344; Rosenblatt v. Bergen, 202 id. 220; Mackay v. Tide Water Oil Co., 186 id. 1.) This disposition makes it unnecessary at this time to pass upon the other questions urged on this appeal. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gerard v. T.A. Clarke Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Gerard v. T.A. Clarke Company

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL M. GERARD, Respondent, v. T.A. CLARKE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1928

Citations

225 App. Div. 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)