From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerard Investing Co., Inc. v. Nat. Rys. of Mexico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1935
243 App. Div. 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

January 25, 1935.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Edgar E. Harrison of counsel [ William Mason Smith and Lewis A. Spence with him on the brief; Van Vorst, Siegel Smith, attorneys], for the appellant, appearing specially.

Hiram S. Gans of counsel [ Joseph Gans with him on the brief; Joseph Gans, attorney], for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., MERRELL, O'MALLEY, TOWNLEY and UNTERMYER, JJ.


The order of August 28, 1934, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. Service was not made by a person authorized to make service of a summons without the State of New York under section 233 of the Civil Practice Act as it read on July 13, 1934, the date of the attempted service. The attempted levy on the indebtedness owing by the New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Company to the defendant must be vacated for the reason that that debt has no situs within the State of New York. ( Cohn v. Enterprise Distributing Corporation, 214 App. Div. 238; Dos Passos v. Morton, 218 id. 154.)

The appeal from order of September 29, 1934, as resettled by the orders of October 29, 1934, and January 4, 1935, denying defendant's motion for leave to renew should be dismissed, without costs.


Order entered August 28, 1934, reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Appeal from order entered September 29, 1934, as resettled by orders entered October 29, 1934, and January 4, 1935, dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Gerard Investing Co., Inc. v. Nat. Rys. of Mexico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1935
243 App. Div. 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Gerard Investing Co., Inc. v. Nat. Rys. of Mexico

Case Details

Full title:GERARD INVESTING CO., INC., Respondent, v. NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF MEXICO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
276 N.Y.S. 1002

Citing Cases

Heydemann v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co.

The Dos Passos and Cohn decisions followed Bridges v. Wade, 113 App. Div. 350, 99 N.Y.S. 126, and expressly…