From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gephart v. Washburn

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jun 24, 2010
Case No. 8:10-cv-830-T-33TBM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 24, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 8:10-cv-830-T-33TBM.

June 24, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Spring Hill Fire and Rescue, Billotte, Bozek, Smith, Flatt, Leondike and Delvecchio's Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15), filed on June 4, 2010. The Motion seek dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint as it pertains to the aforementioned Defendants pursuant to Florida Statute Section 768.28(9)(a), Rules 8(a) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and other governing law.

Florida Statute Section 768.28(9)(a) states in pertinent part that:

No officer, employee, or agent of the state or any of its subdivisions shall be held personally liable in tort or named as a party defendant in any action for injury or damages suffered as a result of any act, event, or omission of action in the scope of his or her employment or function, unless such officer, employee, or agent acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property. . . . The exclusive remedy for injury or damage suffered as a result of an act, event, or omission of an officer, employee, or agent of the state or any of its subdivisions or constitutional officers shall be by action against the governmental entity, or the head of such entity in her or his official capacity, or the constitutional officer of which the officer, employee, or agent is an employee, unless such act or omission was committed in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property. The state or its subdivisions shall not be liable in tort for the acts or omissions of an officer, employee, or agent committed while acting outside the course and scope of her or his employment or committed in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.

Plaintiff failed to file a timely response in opposition to the Motion, and accordingly, the Court considers the Motion as an unopposed motion.

Upon due consideration of the Motion, the Court grants the Motions as unopposed.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

GRANTED. DISMISSED

(1) Defendants Spring Hill Fire and Rescue, Billotte, Bozek, Smith, Flatt, Leondike and Delvecchio's Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15) is (3) Plaintiff's claims against the following Defendants are : Spring Hill Fire and Rescue, James Billotte, Chris Bozek, Steve Smith, Warren H. Flatt, Robert Leondike and Robert Delvecchio. (4) This action shall remain pending against the remaining Defendants. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Gephart v. Washburn

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jun 24, 2010
Case No. 8:10-cv-830-T-33TBM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Gephart v. Washburn

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN GEPHART, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Cherry…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jun 24, 2010

Citations

Case No. 8:10-cv-830-T-33TBM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 24, 2010)