From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Georgi v. Griffin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02126-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02126-RPM

01-11-2012

MARY L. GEORGI, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. GRIFFIN, JAMES L. MCVEY and ROBERT E. O'CONNER, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

Andrew J. Petrie

Rachel R. Mentz

Curt Todd

Larence J. Kelly

William T. Slamkowski

COURTROOM MINUTES

Scheduling Conference

11:02 a.m. Court in session.

Discussion regarding case facts, claims (fraud oral personal guarantee - no note), damages and discovery. Counsel state business venture is a software application (currently in business). There is no claim against business entitiy.

Court agrees with suggestion regarding Rule 31 discovery.

ORDERED: Defendant McVey Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint [23], is granted. Amended Answer filed. Discovery cut-off April 30, 2012.

Scheduling Order signed.

11:25 a.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 23 min.


Summaries of

Georgi v. Griffin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02126-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Georgi v. Griffin

Case Details

Full title:MARY L. GEORGI, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. GRIFFIN, JAMES L. MCVEY and ROBERT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02126-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2012)