From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Georgetown Cnty. v. Davis & Floyd, Inc.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Jun 3, 2020
430 S.C. 317 (S.C. 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2019-000705 Opinion No. 27976

06-03-2020

GEORGETOWN COUNTY, Petitioner, v. DAVIS & FLOYD, INC., Republic Contracting Corporation, S&ME, Inc., the South Carolina Department of Transportation and the City of Georgetown, Defendants, Of whom the South Carolina Department of Transportation and the City of Georgetown are the Respondents.

Louis H. Lang, Richard C. Detwiler, and Harry A. Dixon, of Callison Tighe & Robinson, LLC, all of Columbia, for Petitioner. David Leon Morrison, of Morrison Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for the City of Georgetown; Lisa A. Reynolds, of Anderson Reynolds & Stephens, LLC, of Charleston, for the South Carolina Department of Transportation.


Louis H. Lang, Richard C. Detwiler, and Harry A. Dixon, of Callison Tighe & Robinson, LLC, all of Columbia, for Petitioner.

David Leon Morrison, of Morrison Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for the City of Georgetown; Lisa A. Reynolds, of Anderson Reynolds & Stephens, LLC, of Charleston, for the South Carolina Department of Transportation.

PER CURIAM:

We granted Georgetown County's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Georgetown County v. Davis & Floyd, Inc. , 426 S.C. 52, 824 S.E.2d 471 (Ct. App. 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Georgetown Cnty. v. Davis & Floyd, Inc.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Jun 3, 2020
430 S.C. 317 (S.C. 2020)
Case details for

Georgetown Cnty. v. Davis & Floyd, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Georgetown County, Petitioner, v. Davis & Floyd, Inc., Republic…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Jun 3, 2020

Citations

430 S.C. 317 (S.C. 2020)
844 S.E.2d 650