Opinion
No. 05-08-00731-CR
Opinion Filed September 18, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-73713-IHK.
Before Chief Justice THOMAS and Justices FRANCIS and MURPHY.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Kevin Anthony George appeals the adjudication of his guilt for delivery of cocaine in an amount of one gram or more, but less than four grams. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (c) (Vernon 2003). On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.