From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 11, 2000
764 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 5D00-1960.

Opinion filed August 11, 2000. JULY TERM 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Stephen L. Boyles, Judge.

Travoris Lamar George, Panama City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


George appeals from the final summary denial of his third motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We warn George further appeals are improper and successive. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be raised in a piecemeal fashion. Nor can George raise as grounds for collateral relief, through future rule 3.850 motions, grounds which he could have, but failed to raise on appeal or in his first 3.850 motion.

See George v. State, 753 So.2d 100 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); George v. State, 743 So.2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

See Orr v. State, 691 So.2d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

See Jones v. State, 591 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1991); Young v. State, 724 So.2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

See Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 1995); Zeigler v. State, 654 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 1995).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

George v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 11, 2000
764 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

George v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRAVORIS LAMAR GEORGE, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 11, 2000

Citations

764 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

George v. State

We deny the writ. When this court affirmed the summary denial of his third Rule 3.850 motion in 2000, we…

Ford v. State

AFFIRMED. See Spencer v. State, 842 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2003); Vining v. State, 827 So.2d 201 (Fla. 2000); George…