From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. O'Hare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 15, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv34 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv34

03-15-2020

CECIL MAX GEORGE v. TONY O'HARE, ET AL.


ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Cecil Max George, an inmate confined at the Eastham Unit, proceeding pro se, brings the above-styled lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff's motion for default judgment and motion for demand for judgment be denied.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ACCEPTED. It is therefore

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for default judgment and motion for demand for judgment are DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED March 15, 2020.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

George v. O'Hare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 15, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv34 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2020)
Case details for

George v. O'Hare

Case Details

Full title:CECIL MAX GEORGE v. TONY O'HARE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 15, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv34 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2020)