From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. Heath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-344-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-344-JJB-SCR

09-03-2013

RENEA SHARON DENISE GEORGE DANIELS HEATH v. DANIEL LOUIS HEATH, JR.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated July 29, 2013 (doc. no. 4). The plaintiff filed a "Motion for Appeal" which the court treats as an objection. The objection essentially restates her prior arguments and has been duly considered by the court.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as frivolous.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 3rd day of September, 2013.

________________________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

George v. Heath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 3, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-344-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)
Case details for

George v. Heath

Case Details

Full title:RENEA SHARON DENISE GEORGE DANIELS HEATH v. DANIEL LOUIS HEATH, JR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 3, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-344-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Sep. 3, 2013)