From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. District Attorney of Washington County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 2, 2008
2:07cv1543, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. May. 2, 2008)

Opinion

2:07cv1543, Electronic Filing.

May 2, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On November 13, 2007, this matter was transferred to the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania from the District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. (See Doc. 14 Attachment 1), and, on April 11, 2008, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On April 28, 2008, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) recommending that the District Court dismiss the Petition for failure to prosecute. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on all parties, with service made on Petitioner at his last known address. No objections were filed.

Following a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert George (See Doc. 14 Attachment 1) is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hay (Doc. 19) dated April 28, 2008 is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

George v. District Attorney of Washington County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 2, 2008
2:07cv1543, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. May. 2, 2008)
Case details for

George v. District Attorney of Washington County

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT F. GEORGE, Petitioner v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 2, 2008

Citations

2:07cv1543, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. May. 2, 2008)

Citing Cases

PERO v. DUFFY

And upon consideration of the factors by which this Court's discretion must be guided, see Poulis v. State…