From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. City of Hornellsville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1897
19 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

June Term, 1897.


Motion to dismiss appeals denied, and the defendants, The Bank of Hornellsville and others, allowed forty additional days "to make and serve amendments to the proposed case of the plaintiff, James Fahy." No costs are allowed to any of the parties. Follett, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

George v. City of Hornellsville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1897
19 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

George v. City of Hornellsville

Case Details

Full title:Frank George v. City of Hornellsville et al.; William Howell and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1897

Citations

19 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)