From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Jan 8, 2019
Appellate case number: 01-18-01115-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-18-01115-CV

01-08-2019

George M. Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline


ORDER Trial court case number: 36282 Trial court: 21st District Court of Washington County

Appellant, George M. Bishop. III, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court's "Modified Judgment of Partially Probated Suspension." And, appellant has filed a motion to stay "the active suspension" pending resolution of the appeal. We deny the motion to stay. See Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 3.13 (providing judgment of suspension may be stayed during pendency of appeal if district court finds, upon competent evidence, that appellant's "continued practice of law does not pose a continuing threat to the welfare of [appellant's] clients or to the public"); Favaloro v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline, 13 S.W.3d 831, 840 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2000, no pet.) (concluding appellant who did not show he filed trial court motion to stay suspension did not meet burden to prove continued practice of law did not pose threat).

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: January 8, 2019


Summaries of

Bishop v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Jan 8, 2019
Appellate case number: 01-18-01115-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Bishop v. Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline

Case Details

Full title:George M. Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Jan 8, 2019

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-18-01115-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 8, 2019)