From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Georgacarakos v. Wiley

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 29, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01712-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. May. 29, 2008)

Summary

holding that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant when the plaintiff's sole allegation was that "BOP Defendants were placed on notice of the allegedly unconstitutional conditions at ADX by his various grievances, and that their failure to remedy the situation constitutes acquiescence."

Summary of this case from Gowadia v. Stearns

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01712-MSK-MEH.

May 29, 2008


ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL


THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or security pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court has granted the Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In addition, Defendants have provided the current address of Defendant Warden Pugh under seal [ see docket #176]. It now is

ORDERED that, if appropriate, the Clerk shall attempt to obtain a waiver of service from Defendant Warden Pugh. If unable to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, order granting leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and all other orders upon the Defendant. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of these documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Warden Pugh or counsel for the Defendant shall respond to the complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of process on the Defendant.


Summaries of

Georgacarakos v. Wiley

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 29, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01712-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. May. 29, 2008)

holding that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant when the plaintiff's sole allegation was that "BOP Defendants were placed on notice of the allegedly unconstitutional conditions at ADX by his various grievances, and that their failure to remedy the situation constitutes acquiescence."

Summary of this case from Gowadia v. Stearns

finding that personal jurisdiction did not arise simply because the director of the BOP received notice of allegedly unconstitutional conditions

Summary of this case from Sutter v. Goetz

finding that personal jurisdiction did not arise simply because the director of the BOP received notice of allegedly unconstitutional conditions

Summary of this case from Birman v. Berkebile

finding claim timely when it was "not clear . . . how frequently [the plaintiff's] eligibility for a less-secure classification [wa]s revisited"

Summary of this case from J.S. v. Killian

applying continuing violation doctrine to plaintiff's claims that defendants conspired to hold him at a security classification more restrictive than the one for which he was eligible and that he was held in constitutionally insufficient conditions

Summary of this case from Silverstein v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Case details for

Georgacarakos v. Wiley

Case Details

Full title:PETER GEORGACARAKOS, Plaintiff, v. WILEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: May 29, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01712-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. May. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sutter v. Goetz

Hill v. Pugh, 75 F. App'x 715, 719 (10th Cir. 2003). To the extent Defendant Revell may have received…

Silverstein v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

On the other hand, this Court has applied the doctrine to a prisoner's Bivens claims that are highly…