Opinion
Civil Action 4:21-cv-00803
06-13-2022
GEOLINK LIMITED U.K., Plaintiff, v. MAZAHAR MAHMOOD, et al, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Hon. Charles Eskridge, District Judge
Pending is a Memorandum and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Sam S. Sheldon dated March 18, 2022. Dkt 68. Also pending are objections filed by Plaintiff Geolink Limited (U.K.). Dkt 69.
The district court reviews de novo those conclusions of a magistrate judge to which a party has specifically objected. See FRCP 72(b)(3) & 28 USC § 636(b)(1)(C); see also United States v Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir 1989, per curiam). The district court may accept any other portions to which there's no objection if satisfied that no clear error appears on the face of the record. See Guillory v PPG Industries Inc, 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir 2005), citing Douglass v United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir 1996, en banc); see also FRCP 72(b) advisory committee note (1983).
Upon de novo review and determination, Plaintiff's objections lack merit. No clear error otherwise appears upon review and consideration of the Memorandum and Recommendation, the record, and the applicable law.
The objections by Plaintiff Geolink Limited (U.K.) to the Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are OVERRULED. Dkt 69.
The Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the Memorandum and Order of this Court. Dkt 68.
The joint motion by Defendants to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint is GRANTED. Dkt 33.
The motions by Defendants to dismiss Plaintiff's original complaint are DENIED AS MOOT. Dkts 22 & 31.
The motions by Plaintiff seeking leave to amend and to supplement are DENIED. Dkts 42 & 54.
All claims asserted by Plaintiff Geolink Limited (U.K.) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
A final judgment will enter separately.
SO ORDERED.