From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geocomply Sols. v. XPoint Servs.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 8, 2024
No. 2023-1578 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2024)

Opinion

2023-1578

11-08-2024

GEOCOMPLY SOLUTIONS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. XPOINT SERVICES LLC, Defendant-Appellee

SETH W. LLOYD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DEANNE MAYNARD; RICHARD HUNG, San Francisco, CA; DOUGLAS A. GRADY, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Seattle, WA; ANDREW SAMUELS, Columbus, OH. PETER ANDREW SWANSON, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by GARY RUBMAN; MICHAEL E. BOWLUS, San Francisco, CA.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:22-cv-01273-WCB, Circuit Judge William C. Bryson.

SETH W. LLOYD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DEANNE MAYNARD; RICHARD HUNG, San Francisco, CA; DOUGLAS A. GRADY, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Seattle, WA; ANDREW SAMUELS, Columbus, OH.

PETER ANDREW SWANSON, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by GARY RUBMAN; MICHAEL E. BOWLUS, San Francisco, CA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

DYK, CLEVENGER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Geocomply Sols. v. XPoint Servs.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 8, 2024
No. 2023-1578 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Geocomply Sols. v. XPoint Servs.

Case Details

Full title:GEOCOMPLY SOLUTIONS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. XPOINT SERVICES LLC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 8, 2024

Citations

No. 2023-1578 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2024)