Opinion
No. 05-08-00878-CR
Opinion issued October 28, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 219-83159-06.
Before Justices MORRIS, BRIDGES, and MURPHY.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Steven Francis Gentry of possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine in an amount of four grams or more, but less than 200 grams, and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment, probated for seven years, and a $10,000 fine. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.
The indictment recites appellant's name as "Stephen Francis Gentry." However, the record shows appellant signs his name as "Steven Francis Gentry."