Gentry v. State

Full title: Damion Gentry v. The State of Texas

Court: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTO

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Cause number: 01-14-00335-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-14-00335-CRCause number: 01-14-00336-CR

09-30-2014

Damion Gentry v. The State of Texas

Laura C. Higley

ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter's Record Party filing motion:Court reporter Document to be filed: Reporter's Record Is appeal accelerated? No If motion to extend time:

Original due date: June 16, 2014
Number of extensions granted: 3 Current Due date: September 16, 2014
Date Requested: October 10, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

[ ] Granted
[ ] Denied
[v] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[ ] Other: ____________________
Though the court reporter requested an extension until October 10, 2014, to file the reporter's records in both cases, she apparently filed both of them on September 29, 2014. Accordingly, the motion is dismissed as moot. Because the clerk's record was filed in both cases, the record is complete. Appellant's brief is ordered to be filed within 30 days of the filing of the reporter's record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2). The State's brief, if any, is due within 30 days of the filing of appellant's brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ____________________ Date: September 30, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision