From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gentry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Sep 11, 2018
557 S.W.3d 524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 106051

09-11-2018

Charles E. GENTRY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Maleaner Ryna Harvey, Office of the State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Maleaner Ryna Harvey, Office of the State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., and Mary K. Hoff, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAMCharles E. Gentry appeals from the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order, Judgment, and Decree of Court" denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Gentry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Sep 11, 2018
557 S.W.3d 524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Gentry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles E. GENTRY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Sep 11, 2018

Citations

557 S.W.3d 524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)