("The notice of appeal mentions a Nunc Pro Tunc Order signed on March 5, 2002, which . . . amends and supersedes two previous orders of dismissal concerning other parties."); Lindsey v. Panhandle Const. Co., 46 S.W.2d 339, 342 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1932) ("Where the original judgment has been superseded by another judgment entered nunc pro tunc at a subsequent term of the court, the appeal must be from the last judgment[.]"), aff'd, 72 S.W.2d 1068 (Tex. 1934); Euston v. Euston, 759 S.W.2d 788, 790 (Tex. App.-El Paso 1988, no writ) ("We have only concerned ourselves with the nunc pro tunc decree, since we consider it to have superseded the earlier judgment and is the only appealable judgment."); Gentry v. McKnight Const. Co., 449 S.W.2d 287, 287 (Tex. App.- Texarkana 1969, writ ref'd n.r.e.) ("The original judgment entered was superseded by a nunc pro tunc judgment.")
Appellants fear that the multiple judgments entitle Park to a windfall, but their concern is unfounded. See Nielsen v. Ford Motor Co., 612 S.W.2d 209, 211 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.) ("There can be no doubt that where a plaintiff obtains a judgment against one of several joint tort-feasors and accepts satisfaction of such judgment, all other joint tort-feasors are thereby released."); Gentry v. McKnight Constr. Co., 449 S.W.2d 287, 288 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana 1969, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (citing Restatement Law of Judgments for the proposition that "'[t]he discharge or satisfaction of the judgment against one of several persons each of whom is liable for a tort, breach of contract, or other breach of duty, discharges each of the others from liability therefor'"); Hunt v. Ziegler, 271 S.W. 936, 938 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1925) ("It is a universal rule that where there has been a judgment against one of two or more joint tort-feasors, followed by an acceptance of satisfaction, all other tortfeasors are thereby released . . . ."), aff'd, 280 S.W. 546 (Tex. 1926). The trial court did not violate the one-satisfaction rule in rendering judgment against Appellants.