From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gentry v. Maxwell

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Sep 14, 1933
134 Cal.App. 193 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 589.

September 14, 1933.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. O.K. Morton, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Harry W. Horton for Appellants.

Best Best for Respondent.


A printed transcript was filed on August 31, 1931. [1] No brief having been filed by either party, this court, on its own motion, noticed an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for September 12, 1933.

No cause being shown and no appearance having been made, the appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Gentry v. Maxwell

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Sep 14, 1933
134 Cal.App. 193 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Gentry v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:I.H. GENTRY et al., Appellants, v. JAMES B. MAXWELL, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 14, 1933

Citations

134 Cal.App. 193 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
25 P.2d 43

Citing Cases

Tompkins v. Tompkins

In the previous case of Morgan v. Morgan, 106 Cal.App.2d 189 [ 234 P.2d 782], the court stated at page 192:…

Morgan v. Morgan

It has frequently been held, at least as to executory provisions of a property settlement agreement, that…