Plaintiff fails to make any meaningful objection, and in fact fails to even acknowledge the lowered rates that are being charged by Defendants' attorneys in this case, focusing solely on Ms. Kress's and Ms. McClendon's standard hourly rates of $375 and $780 respectively. (Plf.'s Opp'n at 6.) Plaintiff provides no explanation for why any of the rates charged are not reasonable. By contrast, other courts in this district have in recent years awarded similar hourly rates in foreclosure cases. Compare with Gens v. Colonial Sav. F.A., 11-cv-5526-RMW, 2015 WL 1737550, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2015) (finding hourly rates of $350 for an attorney with 7 years of experience and $495 for an attorney with 19 years of experience to be reasonable); see also Gens, 11-cv-5526-RMW, Dkt. No. 173 at 9-10; Makreas v. First Nat'l Bank of N. Cal., Case No. 11-cv-2234-JST, 2014 WL 2582027, at *6 (N.D. Cal. June 9, 2014) (finding hourly rates between $180 and $425 to be reasonable). Thus, given counsel's experience, in particular Ms. Kress's specialization in mortgage-related cases, the Court finds that the attorney hourly rates of $300 and $450 are reasonable.