From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genovese v. Inch

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 5, 2020
290 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 4D19-3000

02-05-2020

Arthur GENOVESE, Petitioner, v. Mark INCH, Secretary, State of Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Arthur Genovese, Indiantown, pro se. No appearance required for respondent.


Arthur Genovese, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for respondent.

Per Curiam. We redesignate this proceeding as an appeal from the trial court's final order dismissing the habeas corpus petition that was filed below. We treat the petition for writ of certiorari as the initial brief and summarily affirm. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). The trial court properly dismissed the habeas corpus petition as unauthorized as it attempted to bring an unauthorized postconviction challenge to a criminal conviction entered by another circuit court. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004) ; Buss v. Reichman , 53 So. 3d 339, 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Summarily affirmed.

Warner, May and Conner, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Genovese v. Inch

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 5, 2020
290 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Genovese v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR GENOVESE, Petitioner, v. MARK INCH, Secretary, STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 5, 2020

Citations

290 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Alvarez v. State

We treat the petition for writ of certiorari as an appeal from the trial court's final order dismissing the…

Alvarez v. State

We treat the petition for writ of certiorari as an appeal from the trial court's final order dismissing the…