From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genfit S. A. v. Cymabay Therapeutics Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
21-cv-00395-MMC (AGT) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-00395-MMC (AGT)

12-09-2021

GENFIT S. A., Plaintiff, v. CYMABAY THERAPEUTICS INC., Defendant.


DISCOVERY ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 125

ALEX G. TSE United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court won't compel Dr. Hirschfield, a nonparty, to meet informally with Genfit; Genfit can depose Dr. Hirschfield under Rules 30 and 45. Nor will the Court evaluate in the abstract the reach of Dr. Hirschfield's confidentiality agreement with CymaBay. If the confidentiality agreement is invoked in response to a specific line of questioning at Dr. Hirschfield's deposition, the parties may, if necessary, bring a dispute about that invocation to the undersigned's attention after the deposition ends.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Genfit S. A. v. Cymabay Therapeutics Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
21-cv-00395-MMC (AGT) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Genfit S. A. v. Cymabay Therapeutics Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GENFIT S. A., Plaintiff, v. CYMABAY THERAPEUTICS INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

21-cv-00395-MMC (AGT) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)