From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Motors Corporation v. Mallard

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 28, 1949
174 F.2d 958 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Opinion

Nos. 9725-9728.

Argued February 10, 1949.

Decided February 28, 1949.

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now the United States District Court for the District of Columbia).

Mr. G.H. Strickland, of Dayton, Ohio, with whom Messrs. John G. Sbarbaro, of Washington, D.C., and R.R. Candor, of Dayton, Ohio, were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. A. Yates Dowell, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. P.E. Siggers, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees Mallard and H. Clay Hofheimer, II.

Mr. Oliver S. Titcomb, of New York City, entered an appearance for appellees Gus Roud and Servel, Inc.

Mr. Loyd H. Sutton, of Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellees Servel, Inc., and Robert Lay Hallock.

Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges.


We find no error in the judgment of the District Court in these cases. It is affirmed upon the opinion of that court.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

General Motors Corporation v. Mallard

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 28, 1949
174 F.2d 958 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
Case details for

General Motors Corporation v. Mallard

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and Edward H. Lutz, appellants, v. Logan L…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 1949

Citations

174 F.2d 958 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Scudder v. Union National Bank

Unless forbidden by statute, it is the rule of law generally, that a promise to accept an existing bill is an…

Lawless v. Temple

The common practice before the act was to write the word "accepted" on the face of the bill, followed by the…