From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Motors Corp. v. Strickland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 25, 2005
913 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

holding that the second final judgment "was a mere republication of the earlier order and did not restart the time for filing an appeal"

Summary of this case from Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ. v. United Faculty

Opinion

No. 1D05-2257.

October 25, 2005.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Janet E. Ferris, Judge.

David B. Shelton and Charles P. Mitchell of Rumberger, Kirk Caldwell, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Steven R. Andrews, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Having considered the appellant's response to the July 15, 2005, order to show cause, we are constrained to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant's notice of appeal, filed May 9, 2005, was not timely as to the Final Order on Attorney Fees and Costs, entered on March 11, 2005. See Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b). Further, the March 22, 2005, Final Judgment for Attorney Fees and Costs was a mere republication of the earlier order and did not restart the time for filing an appeal. See Maxfly Aviation Inc. v. Capital Airlines Ltd., 843 So.2d 973, 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (concluding that the addition of the post-judgment interest rate does not disturb or revise the legal rights and obligations previously established and function as do the words "for which let execution issue" when added later). See also, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(f); Beal Bank, S.S.B., Inc. v. Sherwin, 829 So.2d 961 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (agreeing that the scope of review of an amended final judgment should be limited to the issues affected by the amendment).

KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

General Motors Corp. v. Strickland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 25, 2005
913 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

holding that the second final judgment "was a mere republication of the earlier order and did not restart the time for filing an appeal"

Summary of this case from Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ. v. United Faculty

dismissing appeal where "Final Judgment for Attorney Fees and Costs was a mere republication of the earlier order and did not restart the time for filing an appeal"

Summary of this case from Perez v. Jaimot
Case details for

General Motors Corp. v. Strickland

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Glenn STRICKLAND, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 25, 2005

Citations

913 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Perez v. Jaimot

As Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) requires the filing of a notice of appeal within thirty days…

Nelson v. Wakulla County

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(b); Churchville v. Ocean Grove R.V. Sales, Inc., 876 So.2d 649…